{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["TDLG M&E"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":1,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"TDLG M&E","index":0,"n_rows":26,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":26,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[23,1,25,1],[11,0,25,0],[23,5,24,5],[23,6,24,6],[23,7,24,7],[18,1,20,1],[21,1,22,1],[23,4,24,4],[21,2,22,2],[11,4,12,4],[15,4,16,4],[11,2,17,2],[11,1,17,1],[11,3,12,3],[18,2,20,2],[13,3,16,3],[8,7,9,7],[11,7,12,7],[15,7,16,7],[15,5,16,5],[15,6,16,6],[11,9,12,9],[8,9,9,9],[23,10,24,10],[8,8,9,8],[23,8,24,8],[23,9,24,9],[15,10,16,10],[15,9,16,9],[15,8,16,8],[23,3,24,3],[23,2,25,2],[0,0,0,10],[1,0,1,10],[8,10,9,10],[8,1,9,1],[11,8,12,8],[8,0,9,0],[8,4,9,4],[8,5,9,5],[8,6,9,6],[8,3,9,3],[8,2,9,2],[11,10,12,10],[11,5,12,5],[11,6,12,6]]}
["UNDP Myanmar Country Office"]
["TDLG  Monitoring and Evaluation Framework 2019"]
[]
["Project Name: Township Democratic Local Governance"]
["Duration of Project first phase: 2017 to 2020"]
[]
[]
[]
["Country Programme Document  Indicators","Project Outcomes","Project Ouputs","Activity  Results","Indicator No","Indicators","Baseline 2016","Target 2019","Target for end of first phase of project\n2020","Information collection ","  Frequency of reporting"]
[]
[null,null,"GUIDELINE           Please mention Output statements from Result and Resource Framework (RRF), Project document","Please copy Activity Results statements as per AWP","Please write indicator number as per RRF","Please write precise indicator statements","As per RRF please mention baseline and year of baseline collected",null,null,null,"Monthly? Quarterly?             Semiannualy? Annually?                \n\n\nLevel of detail that csan be included would depend on the practical needs."]
["\nCPD output 1.1: Effective public institutions enabled to develop and implement evidence- based policies and systems that respond to the needs of the people\n\nCPD Indicator 1.1: \nNumber of government development plans, at national/subnational levels, including townships, formulated with UNDP support based on the following principles of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: use of data, inclusive participation, cross-sectoral coordination.\nBaseline (2017): Union – 0/0 Region/State – 0/1 Township – 0/0\nTarget: Union – 1\n             Region/State – 4\n             Township – 64\nSource: Project reports\n\nCPD Indicator 1.2: Number of female village tract administrators\nBaseline (2017): 88\nTarget: 500\nSource: General Administration Department, 2021\n\nCPD Indicator 1.3: Formula-based allocation for participatory local development planning adopted by Government\nBaseline (2017): No such formula exists\nTarget: Formula-based allocation mechanism operational by 2020.\nSource: Project reports\n\nTDLG Output Indicator 1.1.1: Number of townships using formula-based allocation mechanism in participatory planning  \nBaseline (2017): 2\nTarget: 15\nSource: Project reports\n\n","Outcome 1\nTownship administrations respond to local development needs","Output 1: Improved capacity of township administrations to respond to people’s needs","Activity Result 1.1: Township administrations facilitate participatory annual planning cycles\n\n","1.1.2","Number of supported townships which meet set criteria to perform participatory planning effectively (functionality index)","All supported townships start at Level 1 since participatory planning process not followed as per Grant Manual","Out of 15 townships at least 12 townships meet level 3 across 4 functions","Out of 15 townships at least 12 townships meet level 4 across 4 function","Attendance lists and minutes of meetings \nTGO/ STS observations Township plans and reports\nIndependent audit reports","Bi-annually"]
[]
[null,null,null," Activity Result 1.2:  Township administrations  utilize discretionary grants  effectively","1.2.1","Percentage of grant executed within fiscal year ","No grants executed","95% of full grant amount allocated during planning cycle FY 2017/2018 has been liquidated through implementation of planned projects"," 95% of full grant amount allocated during planning cycle FY 2018/2019 has been liquidated through implementation of planned projects  ","FACE forms; Reports from the S/R Governments","Quarterly"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.2","Percentage of projects (a) starting implementation and (b) completed physical and financial progress in line with Grant Manual and Procurement Guidelines ","No grants executed","At least 70 % of selected projects from fiscal year 2018-2019 completed physical progress in line with standards as per Grant Manual and Procurement Guidelines","At least 90% of selected projects from fiscal year 2018-2019 completed physical progress in line with standards as per Grant Manual and Procurement Guidelines ","ICE forms, Grant Tracker Tool, progress reports","Quarterly"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.3","Number of townships where projects meet minimum benchmarks as per Procurement Guidelines ","No procurement guidelines at township level","Out of 15 at least 10 supported townships partially comply with set criteria  ","Out of 15 at least 10 supported townships fully comply with set criteria  ","List of Members of TRVC and QAVC; Quarterly progress report, Tender documents, Picture of public tender notice, TRAC report","Semiannual and annual"]
[]
[null,null,null,"\nActivity Result 1.3: Township administrations are transparent and accountable","1.3.1","Number of supported townships in which at least five social accountability mechanisms are used. ","No social accountability mechanisms in place","Out of 15 at least 10 supported townships use at least five social accountability mechanisms are used effectively   ","15 supported townships use at least five and more social accountability mechanisms are used effectively","Township planning calendar; Tender receiving and assessing committee, Quality assurance and verification committee meeting attendance sheet, Tender committee report","Annually"]
[null,"Outcome 2\nPeople trust in local governance institutions","Output 2: Improved engagement between people and Township Administrations on public service delivery","Activity Result 2.1: Women engaged in township planning\n\n","2.1.1.","Number of women benefitted (trained) from women empowerment measures enable to advocate for women concerns. ","No systematic public participation of women in the planning process","at least 300 women in all 15 supported townships benefitted from women empowerment measures within the framework of the project ","at least 500 women in all 15 supported townships benefitted from women empowerment measures within the framework of the project ","Attendance sheets of every planning workshop, training ","Bi-annually"]
[null,null,null,"Activity Result 2.2: W/VTAs facilitate information sharing between people & Township Administrations\n\n","2.2.1.","Percentage of W/VTAs that hold and document at least three community consultations on community priorities involving both men and women during the planning process ","Participatory planning process stipulated in Grant Manual not followed","at least 300 W/VTA in all 15 supported townships hold at least 3 community consultations involving both men and women during the planning process ","at least 500 W/VTA in all 15 supported townships hold at least 3 community consultations involving both men and women during the planning process ","Reports from community consultations, attendance sheet and reports submitted; TGOs field monitoring reports","Bi-annually"]
[null,null,null,"Activity Result 2.3: Communities engage with Township administrations on service delivery","2.3.1","Percentage of CSO engaged in supported Townships reporting having improved engagement with Township Administrations ","No systematic engagement of CSO with TAs","80% of supported CSO in all supported townships reach level 3","80% of supported CSO in all supported townships reach level 4","Semi-structured Interviews and/or Focus Group Discussions; Review of meeting minutes; TGO Field Reports","Bi-annually"]
[null,"Outcome 3\nTownship administrations and ethnic armed organizations promote responsive and inclusive service delivery jointly","Output 3: Improved EAO engagement in Township planning and public service delivery","Activity Result 3.1: Township Administrations engage EAOs  in township planning\n\n","3.1.1","Percentage of grant that funds projects located in EAO areas ","No project intervention: EAOs not engaged with Township Administrations in planning process","No control over the target since the decisions are taken in a consultative and participatory manner at each planning cycle and therefore selected projects will be defined after prioritization with all key stakeholders. ","No control over the target since the decisions are taken in a consultative and participatory manner at each planning cycle and therefore selected projects will be defined after prioritization with all key stakeholders. ","List of projects and grant allocation, physical and narrative progress reports","Bi-annually"]
[null,null,null,"Activity Result 3.2: TA and EAOs explore mechanisms for coherent, efficient and inclusive service delivery","3.2.1","Number of supported Townships with EAO areas showing improved engagement between EAOs and TA on service delivery ","No project intervention: EAOs not engaged with Township Administrations in planning process"," 75% of supported townships with EAO areas reach Level 2","75% of supported townships with EAO areas reach Level 4","Semi-structured Interviews and/or Focus Group Discussions; Review of meeting minutes","Annually"]
[null,"Outcome 4\nProject model is replicated by Government of Myanmar","Output 4: Dialogue on policy and institutional local governance reforms informed","\nActivity Result 4.1: Research captures lesson learned for policy advocacy\n\n\n","4.1.1.","Number of case studies, policy documents and knowledge products produced based on lesson learned from township planning process, PFM, testing of social accountability, gender actions and engaging CSO in documenting changes at community. ",0,"6 products","at least 15 products","Project reports, policy documents and knowledge products; Minutes of meetings with government representatives","Bi-annually"]
[]
[null,null,null,"Activity Result 4.2: Union/S/R governments discuss policy change based on lessons learned and research","4.1.2.","Number of policy dialogues, workshops and learning events that informed policy discussion in relation to scale up and national replication of township planning model. ",5,7,9,"learning event agenda, workshop agenda","Bi-annually"]